The story of TM is not just one of striking personal experiences but also a story of high quality research.
There are 4 factors that define the reliability of scientific research. The best Transcendental Meditation research tends to get high scores on all 4 factors.
1. Quality of the research itself
2. Confirmation of the same results by several independent researches
3. Publication in a scientific Journal
4. Chance of coincidence
1. Quality and replication
Probably the most intensively researched, standardised, self-development programme in the scientific literature.
During the past 40 years, more than 600 studies, conducted at over 250 universities and research institutions in 35 countries all over the world (list of universities), have confirmed the beneficial effects of the Transcendental Meditation technique on many areas of life. This means that a lot of the effects have been confirmed by many independent studies all over the world. In many cases, meta-analysis studies have been performed which calculate the average effect of many different studies. Such meta-analyses have been done on the effect of TM on hypertension (9 TM studies), addictions (19 TM studies), anxiety (35 TM studies), and self-actualisation (18 TM studies). In each and every case, the effect of TM was significantly larger than other methods that were researched, from 2 to 8 times as large.
The general trend with these 600 studies also shows that:
– Higher Quality TM research (where fewer external factors can influence the results) tends to show better results
– Researchers that are not affiliated with the TM organisation tend to have the same or even better results than researchers that do have some kind of affiliation
– Subjects with low expectations about their TM practice had the same effects as subjects with high expectations. Also, the results tend to increase over time, while expectation effects usually show a strong decrease over time.
Publication in a scientific Journal
TM research has resulted in over 350 scientific publications.
Scientific journals play a very important role in science. They act as a filter to protect science from low quality studies. A study is generally only taken seriously by the scientific world if it is published in such a journal.
Before a journal accepts a research for publication, the research project goes through a process of “peer reviewing”. This means it is carefully reviewed by other experts from the same field of research, who give their opinion whether the research meets all the standards and is of sufficiently high quality. The more prestigious the journal, the more thorough this process is supposed to be, because the reputation of the journal is linked to what it publishes.
Research into the Transcendental Meditation technique has been published in more than 350 different publications (list of publications) by more than 160 different professional journals all over the world, including almost all of the most prestigious journals (list of journals). This is an exceptionally high number of publications on self-development technique or programme.
Chance of coincidence
TM researches have p values that are often 50 to one million times smaller (=better) than the norm
In physics, it’s generally easy to determine cause and effect. In the human sciences, this is much more difficult because people are always exposed to many different influences. This is why “probability”, the statistical calculation of the chance that the result was due to coincidence instead of the cause, is crucial to determine the reliability of any effect. In general, the “p-value” is considered as important, if not more important, than the effect itself.
This sounds logical. When a scientist gives a drug to somebody and claims it will make him happier and the next day the person does feel a little happier, he still can’t say for certain that it was the drug that caused it. Perhaps he got a promotion at work, perhaps he fell in love, perhaps it was a placebo effect. But if we administer the drug to 100 subjects and on average there’s a small increase in happiness with all 100 subjects (=consistent effect), then the chance that it was a coincidence will be much lower. If we then see that all 100 subjects feel happier than they ever felt before (=large effect), we can say with a very high degree of certainty that it probably was not a coincidence.
The norm in science is that scientist have to be at least 95% sure that it was not a coincidence, this is indicated as p<.05, the probability is smaller than 5 in hundred. The more consistent (= more reliable) and the stronger the effect, the smaller the chance that it was a coincidence, and the smaller the p value.
Transcending is described by the ancient texts as the highest human experience, essential for our full human development. But, for centuries, mankind hasn’t known this experience, because the way to get there (meditation) has been completely misinterpreted. If it is true that Transcendental Meditation is really a an effective method to transcend and develop our full human potential, then it should also deliver remarkable results or possibly even results that have never been seen before. The exceptionally small p values that appear with a large number of TM studies, which are often 50 to 1 million times smaller (=better) than the norm (p<.001 to p<.000000001), do seem to confirm that some of the effects are remarkable.